Paper detail

Obscuring fraction of active galactic nuclei implied by supernova and radiative feedbacks

We study the obscuring structure of circumnuclear disks (CNDs) by considering supernova (SN) feedbacks from nuclear starburst and the effect of anisotropic radiative pressure from AGNs. We suppose that the mass accretion onto a central supermassive black hole (SMBH) is triggered by SN-driven turbulence within CNDs, and we explore how the structures of CNDs depend on the BH mass ($M_{\rm BH}$) and AGN luminosity ($L_{\rm AGN}$). We find that the obscuring fraction ($f_{\rm obs}$) peaks at $\sim10\%$ of the Eddington luminosity ($L_{\rm Edd}$), and its maximal value is $f_\mathrm{obs} \sim 0.6$ for less massive SMBHs (e.g., $M_{\rm BH} < 10^{8}M_{\odot}$). This is because the scale height of CNDs is determined by the SN-driven accretion for a smaller $L_{\rm AGN}$, while the dusty molecular gas in CNDs is blown away by the radiation pressure from AGNs beyond the critical luminosity. On the other hand, for massive SMBHs (e.g., $M_{\rm BH} > 10^{8}M_{\odot}$), $f_{\rm obs}$ is always smaller than $0.2$, and it is almost independent of $L_{\rm AGN}$ because the scale height of CNDs is mainly controlled by the maximal star-formation efficiency ($C_{\rm *, max}$) in CNDs. By comparison with the obscuring fractions suggested from the mid-infrared observations of nearby AGNs, the SN plus radiative feedback model with $C_{\rm *, max} = 10^{-7}\, {\rm yr}^{-1}$ well reproduces the observations for $M_\mathrm{BH} = 10^8 M_\odot$. We also find that the intense starburst or the existence of dust-free absorbers inside CNDs are necessary, to explain X-ray observations.

preprint2019arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.