Paper detail

Oblique corrections from less-Higgsless models in warped space

The Higgsless model in warped extra dimension is reexamined. Dirichlet boundary conditions on the TeV brane are replaced with Robin boundary conditions which are parameterized by a mass parameter $M$. We calculate the Peskin-Takeuchi precision parameters $S$, $T$ and $U$ at tree level. We find that to satisfy the constraints on the precision parameters at $99 \%$ [$95 \%$] confidence level (CL) the first Kaluza-Klein excited $Z$ boson, $Z'$, should be heavier than 5 TeV [8 TeV]. The Magnitude of $M$, which is infinitely large in the original model, should be smaller than 200 GeV (70 GeV) for the curvature of the warped space $R^{-1}=10^{16}$ GeV ($10^{8}$ GeV) at $95\%$ CL. If the Robin boundary conditions are induced by the mass terms localized on the TeV brane, from the $99\%$ [$95\%$] bound we find that the brane mass interactions account for more than $97\%$ [$99\%$] of the masses of $Z$ and $W$ bosons. Such a brane mass term is naturally interpreted as a vacuum expectation value of the Higgs scalar field in the standard model localized on the TeV brane. If so, the model can be tested by precise measurements of $HWW$, $HZZ$ couplings and search for 1st Kaluza-Klein excited states.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.