Paper detail

Objective Bayesian analysis of "on/off" measurements

In high-energy astrophysics, it is common practice to account for the background overlaid with the counts from the source of interest with the help of auxiliary measurements carried on by pointing off-source. In this "on/off" measurement, one knows the number of photons detected while pointing to the source, the number of photons collected while pointing away of the source, and how to estimate the background counts in the source region from the flux observed in the auxiliary measurements. For very faint sources, the number of detected photons is so low that the approximations which hold asymptotically are not valid. On the other hand, the analytical solution exists for the Bayesian statistical inference, which is valid at low and high counts. Here we illustrate the objective Bayesian solution based on the reference posterior and compare the result with the approach very recently proposed by \citet{knoetig2014}, discussing its most delicate points. In addition, we propose to compute the significance of the excess with respect to the background-only expectation with a method which is able to account for any uncertainty on the background and is valid for any photon count. This method is compared to the widely used significance formula by \citet{LiMa83}, which is based on asymptotic properties.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.