Paper detail

Object Pose Estimation in Robotics Revisited

Vision based object grasping and manipulation in robotics require accurate estimation of object's 6D pose. The 6D pose estimation has received significant attention in computer vision community and multiple datasets and evaluation metrics have been proposed. However, the existing metrics measure how well two geometrical surfaces are aligned - ground truth vs. estimated pose - which does not directly measure how well a robot can perform the task with the given estimate. In this work we propose a probabilistic metric that directly measures success in robotic tasks. The evaluation metric is based on non-parametric probability density that is estimated from samples of a real physical setup. During the pose evaluation stage the physical setup is not needed. The evaluation metric is validated in controlled experiments and a new pose estimation dataset of industrial parts is introduced. The experimental results with the parts confirm that the proposed evaluation metric better reflects the true performance in robotics than the existing metrics.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.