Paper detail

O(log log rank) Competitive-Ratio for the Matroid Secretary Problem

In the \textit{Matroid Secretary Problem} (MSP), the elements of the ground set of a Matroid are revealed on-line one by one, each together with its value. An algorithm for the MSP is \textit{Matroid-Unknown} if, at every stage of its execution: (i) it only knows the elements that have been revealed so far and their values, and (ii) it has access to an oracle for testing whether or not any subset of the elements that have been revealed so far is an independent set. An algorithm is \textit{Known-Cardinality} if, in addition to (i) and (ii), it also initially knows the cardinality of the ground set of the Matroid. We present here a Known-Cardinality and \textit{Order-Oblivious} algorithm that, with constant probability, selects an independent set of elements, whose value is at least the optimal value divided by $O(\log{\logρ})$, where $ρ$ is the rank of the Matroid; that is, the algorithm has a \textit{competitive-ratio} of $O(\log{\logρ})$. The best previous results for a Known-Cardinality algorithm are a competitive-ratio of $O(\logρ)$, by Babaioff \textit{et al.} (2007), and a competitive-ratio of $O(\sqrt{\logρ})$, by Chakraborty and Lachish (2012). In many non-trivial cases the algorithm we present has a competitive-ratio that is better than the $O(\log{\logρ})$. The cases in which it fails to do so are easily characterized. Understanding these cases may lead to improved algorithms for the problem or, conversely, to non-trivial lower bounds.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.