Paper detail

[O III] Equivalent Width and Orientation Effects in Quasars

The flux of the [OIII] line is considered to be a good indicator of the bolometric emission of quasars. The observed continuum emission from the accretion disc should instead be strongly dependent on the inclination angle theta between the disc axis and the line of sight. Based on this, the equivalent width (EW) of [OIII] should provide a direct measure of theta. Here we analyze the distribution of EW([OIII]) in a sample of ~6,000 SDSS quasars, and find that it can be accurately reproduced assuming a relatively small intrinsic scatter and a random distribution of inclination angles. This result has several implications: 1) it is a direct proof of the disc-like emission of the optical continuum of quasars; 2) the value of EW([OIII]) can be used as a proxy of the inclination, to correct the measured continuum emission and then estimate the bolometric luminosity of quasars; 3) the presence of almost edge-on discs among broad line quasars implies that the accretion disc is not aligned with the circumnuclear absorber, and/or that the covering fraction of the latter is rather small. Finally, we show that a similar analysis of EW distributions of broad lines (Hbeta, Mg II, C IV) provides no evidence of inclination effects, suggesting a disc-like geometry of the broad emission line region.

preprint2010arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.