Paper detail

Nurturing Lyman Break Galaxies: Observed link between environment and spectroscopic features

We examine the effects of magnitude, colour, and Ly-alpha equivalent width (EW) on the spatial distribution of z~3 Lyman break galaxies (LBGs) and report significant differences in their auto-correlation functions (ACFs). The results are obtained using samples of ~10,000-57,000 LBGs from the Canada-France-Hawaii Telescope Legacy Survey. We find that magnitude has a larger effect on the ACF amplitude on small scales (<~1 Mpc) and that colour is more influential on large scales (>~1 Mpc). We find the most significant differences between ACFs for LBGs with dominant net Ly-alpha EW in absorption (aLBGs) and dominant net Ly-alpha EW in emission (eLBGs) determined from >~95% pure samples of each population using a photometric technique calibrated from ~1000 spectra. The aLBG ACF one-halo term departs from a power law fit near ~1 Mpc, corresponding to the virial radii of M_DM ~10^13 M_solar haloes, and shows a strong two-halo term amplitude. In contrast, the eLBG ACF one-halo term departs at ~0.12 Mpc, suggesting parent haloes of M_DM ~10^11 M_solar, and a two-halo term that exhibits a `hump' on intermediate scales that we localize to the faintest, bluest members. We find that the `hump' can be well fit with a model in which a significant fraction of eLBGs reside on shells. The auto- and cross-correlation functions indicate that aLBGs are found in massive, group-like haloes and that eLBGs are found largely on group outskirts and in the field. Ly-alpha is a tracer of several intrinsic LBG properties, including morphology, implying that the mechanisms behind the morphology-density relation are in place at z~3 and that Ly-alpha EW may be a key environment diagnostic. Finally, our results show that the mass of LBGs has been underestimated because the LBG ACF amplitude is lower than the true average as a result of the spatial anti-correlation of the spectral sub-types (abridged).

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.