Paper detail

Numerical Study of the Correspondence Between the Dissipative and Fixed Energy Abelian Sandpile Models

We consider the Abelian sandpile model (ASM) on the large square lattice with a single dissipative site (sink). Particles are added by one per unit time at random sites and the resulting density of particles is calculated as a function of time. We observe different scenarios of evolution depending on the value of initial uniform density (height) $h_0=0,1,2,3$. During the first stage of the evolution, the density of particles increases linearly. Reaching a critical density $ρ_c(h_0)$, the system changes its behavior sharply and relaxes exponentially to the stationary state of the ASM with $ρ_s=25/8$. We found numerically that $ρ_c(0)=ρ_s$ and $ρ_c(h_0>0) \neq ρ_s$. Our observations suggest that the equality $ρ_c=ρ_s$ holds for more general initial conditions with non-positive heights. In parallel with the ASM, we consider the conservative fixed-energy Abelian sandpile model (FES). The extensive Monte-Carlo simulations for $h_0=0,1,2,3$ have confirmed that in the limit of large lattices $ρ_c(h_0)$ coincides with the threshold density $ρ_{th}(h_0)$ of FES. Therefore, $ρ_{th}(h_0)$ can be identified with $ρ_s$ if the FES starts its evolution with non-positive uniform height $h_0 \leq 0$.

preprint2011arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.