Paper detail

Numerical stability of mass transfer driven by Roche lobe overflow in close binaries

Numerical computation of the time evolution of the mass transfer rate in a close binary can be and, in particular, has been a computational challenge. Using a simple physical model to calculate the mass transfer rate, we show that for a simple explicit iteration scheme the mass transfer rate is numerically unstable unless the time steps are sufficiently small. In general, more sophisticated explicit algorithms do not provide any significant improvement since this instability is a direct result of time discretization. For a typical binary evolution, computation of the mass transfer rate as a smooth function of time limits the maximum tolerable time step and thereby sets the minimum total computational effort required for an evolutionary computation. By methods of ``Controlling Chaos'' it can be shown that a specific implicit iteration scheme, based on Newton's method, is the most promising solution for the problem.

preprint2005arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.