Paper detail

Numerical simulations of sunspot decay: On the penumbra -- Evershed flow -- moat flow connection

We present a series of high-resolution sunspot simulations that cover a time span of up to 100 hours. The simulation domain extends about 18 Mm in depth beneath the photosphere and 98 Mm horizontally. We use open boundary conditions that do not maintain the initial field structure against decay driven by convective motions. We consider two setups: A sunspot simulation with penumbra, and a "naked-spot" simulation in which we removed the penumbra after 20 hours through a change in the magnetic top boundary condition. While the sunspot has an Evershed outflow of 3-4 km/s, the naked spot is surrounded by an inflow of 1-2 km/s in close proximity. However, both spots are surrounded by an outflow on larger scales with a few 100 m/s flow speed in the photosphere. While the sunspot has almost constant magnetic flux content for the simulated time span of 3-4 days, the naked spot decays steadily at a rate of $10^{21}$ Mx/day. A region with reduced downflow filling factor, which is more extended for the sunspot, surrounds both spots. The absence of downflows perturbs the upflow/downflow massflux balance and leads to a large-scale radially overturning flow system, the photospheric component of this flow is to the observable moat flow. The reduction of the downflow filling factor also inhibits submergence of magnetic field in the proximity of the spots, which stabilizes them against decay. While this effect is present for both spots, it is more pronounced for the sunspot and explains the almost stationary magnetic flux content.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Authors

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.