Paper detail

Numerical Prediction and Post-Test Numerical Analysis of the ASDMAD Wind Tunnel Tests in ETW

This paper presents numerical results in comparison with experimental data of nominally static aeroelastic polars of the second ASDMAD (Aero-Structural Dynamics Methods for Airplane Design) campaign conducted in the European Transonic Windtunnel. For the simulation the modular solver package SOFIA combined with the DLR solver TAU on the fluid side and the in-house solver FEAFA on the structural side is applied. First the experimental setup and the aeroelastic solver are introduced, followed by a detailed analysis of the results. Comparisons of pressure distributions and the global lift coefficients are presented for variations of angle of attack, Mach number and aerodynamic loading factor. Additionally, the paper contains preliminary investigations of dynamic results for excited vibration applying periodical inner force couples in the wing root area.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access6 authors3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.