Paper detail

Numerical models of blackbody-dominated gamma-ray bursts -- II. Emission properties

Blackbody-dominated (BBD) gamma-ray bursts (GRBs) are events characterized by long durations and the presence of a significant thermal component following the prompt emission, as well as by the absence of a typical afterglow. GRB 101225A is the most prominent member of this class. A plausible progenitor system for it and for BBD-GRBs is the merger a neutron star and a helium core of an evolved, massive star. Using relativistic hydrodynamic simulations we model the propagation of ultrarelativistic jets through the environments created by such mergers. In a previous paper we showed that the thermal emission in BBD-GRBs is linked to the interaction of an ultrarelativistic jet with the ejected envelope of the secondary star of the binary. Here we focus on explaining the emission properties of BBD-GRBs computing the whole radiative signature (both thermal and non-thermal) of the jet dynamical evolution. The non-thermal emission of the forward shock of the jet is dominant during the early phases of the evolution, when that shock is moderately relativistic. Our models do not produce a classical afterglow because the quick deceleration of the jet results primarily from the mass entrainment in the beam, and not from the process of plowing mass from the external medium in front of the GRB ejecta. The contribution of the reverse shock is of the same magnitude than that of the forward shock during the first 80 min after the GRB. Later, it quickly fades because the jet/environment interaction chocks the ultrarelativistic jet beam and effectively dumps the reverse shock. In agreement with observations, we obtain rather flat light curves during the first 2 d after the GRB, and a spectral evolution consistent with the observed reddening of the system.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access5 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.