Paper detail

Numerical methods for the sign problem in Lattice Field Theory

The great majority of algorithms employed in the study of lattice field theory are based on Monte Carlo's importance sampling method, i.e. on probability interpretation of the Boltzmann weight. Unfortunately in many theories of interest one cannot associated a real and positive weight to every configuration, that is because their action is explicitly complex or because the weight is multiplied by some non positive term. In this cases one says that the theory on the lattice is affected by the sign problem. An outstanding example of sign problem preventing a quantum field theory to be studied, is QCD at finite chemical potential. Whenever the sign problem is present, standard Monte Carlo methods are problematic to apply and, in general, new approaches are needed to explore the phase diagram of the complex theory. Here we will review three of the main candidate methods to deal with the sign problem, namely complex Langevin dynamics, Lefschetz thimbles and density of states method. We will first study complex Langevin dynamics, combined with the gauge cooling method, on the one-dimensional Polyakov line model, and then we will apply it to pure gauge Yang-Mills theory with a topological theta-term. It follows a comparison between complex Langevin dynamics and the Lefschetz thimbles method on three toy models, which are the quartic model, the U(1) one-link model with a mu dependent determinant, and the SU(2) non abelian one-link model with complex beta parameter. Lastly, we introduce the density of state method, based on the LLR algorithm, and we will employ it in the study of the relativistic Bose gas at finite chemical potential.

preprint2016arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.