Paper detail

Numerical methods for checking the regularity of subdivision schemes

In this paper, motivated by applications in computer graphics and animation, we study the numerical methods for checking $C^k-$regularity of vector multivariate subdivision schemes with dilation 2I. These numerical methods arise from the joint spectral radius and restricted spectral radius approaches, which were shown in Charina (Charina, 2011) to characterize $W^k_p-$regularity of subdivision in terms of the same quantity. Namely, the $(k,p)-$joint spectral radius and the $(k,p)-$restricted spectral radius are equal. We show that the corresponding numerical methods in the univariate scalar and vector cases even yield the same upper estimate for the $(k,\infty)-$joint spectral radius for a certain choice of a matrix norm. The difference between the two approaches becomes apparent in the multivariate case and we confirm that they indeed offer different numerical schemes for estimating the regularity of subdivision. We illustrate our results with several examples.

preprint2012arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.