Paper detail

Numerical Investigation of Pressure Losses and its Effect During Intake in a Steam Wankel Expander

A Wankel steam expander has numerous advantages over other positive displacement machines as an expansion device. This is due to its high power to weight ratio, compactness, lower noise, vibration, and potentially lower specific cost making them a favourable choice over reciprocating expanders. Admission in the expander chamber occurs through rotary valves fed with steam supply from a boiler. The present study aims to investigate the magnitude of pressure losses of the steam during intake and its effect on the net power output of the expander over a range of rotational speed varying from 1200 to 3000 RPM. The thermodynamic analysis is carried out for the theoretical pressure-volume cycle of the expander using Python, which is then used for CFD analysis in Ansys Fluent 19.2. Three dimensional models are developed for the flow domain stretching from the exit of the intake valve port to the port in the rotor housing at different rotor angles ranging from admission to cutoff. Computations are performed to investigate the associated pressure drop of steam during admission. The boundary conditions at different rotor angles are obtained from the thermodynamic model of the expander's theoretical pressure-volume plot, and the state point values were obtained from the REFPROP database. Validation of the CFD models are carried out by comparing pressure drop values obtained through an analytical approach using correlations and expressions reported in literature. A thorough performance analysis of this expansion device is made and the loss in power output due to the intake pressure loss is calculated. These losses during admission change the pressure ratio across the actual expander designed for a given pressure ratio, leading to a reduced power output by a reasonable margin of 20 to 30%. It is observed that the percentage loss in power output increases with an increase in shaft speed.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.