Paper detail

Numerical Investigation of Coaxial GCH4/LOx Combustion at Supercritical Pressures

This article aims to numerically investigate the combustion phenomenon of coaxial gaseous CH4 LOx at supercritical pressures. The choice of turbulence model, real gas model, and chemical kinetics model are the critical parameters in numerical simulations of cryogenic combustion at high pressure. At this supercritical operating pressure, the ideal gas law does not remain valid for such cases. Therefore, we have systematically carried out a comparative study to analyze the importance of real gas models, turbulence parameters, and chemical kinetics at such conditions. The comparison of real gas models with the NIST database reveals better conformity of SRK (Soave Redlich Kwong Equation of State (EoS)) model predictions with the database. Further, the computed results indicate that the Standard k-e turbulence model with modified constant captures the better flame shape and temperature peak position compared to other RANS based turbulence models while invoking the non-premixed steady b-PDF flamelet model for simulating the combustion process. Furthermore, a comparative study comparing two different chemical kinetics models indicates that the reduced Jones Lindstedt mechanism can accurately predict the flame characteristics with the least computational cost. Finally, we have studied the effect of chamber pressure and LOx inlet temperature on the flame characteristics. The flame characteristics exhibit a strong sensitivity towards the chamber pressure due to the weakening of the pseudo-boiling effect with an increase in pressure. As a consequence of lower turbulent rates of energy and mass transfer through the transcritical mixing layer, the flame spreading becomes narrower at elevated pressure and temperature, thereby yielding an increased flame length at transcritical conditions.

preprint2021arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.