Paper detail

Numerical investigation of airborne transmission in low-ceiling rooms under displacement ventilation

This study employs computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations to evaluate the risk of airborne transmission of COVID-19 in low-ceiling rooms, such as elevator cabins, under mechanical displacement ventilation. The simulations take into account the effects of the human body's thermal environment and respiratory jet dynamics on the transmission of pathogens. The results of the study are used to propose a potential mitigation strategy based on ventilation thermal control to reduce the risk of airborne transmission in these types of enclosed indoor spaces. Our findings demonstrate that as the ventilation rate (Qv) increases, the efficiency of removing airborne particles (Ep) initially increases rapidly, reaches a plateau (Ep,c) at a critical ventilation rate (Qc), and subsequently increases at a slower rate beyond Qc. The Qc for low-ceiling rooms is lower compared to high-ceiling rooms due to the increased interaction between the thermal plume generated by the occupants or infectors and the ventilation. Further analysis of the flow and temperature fields reveals that Ep is closely linked to the thermal stratification fields, as characterized by the thermal interface height, the height of the temperature isosurface, and temperature gradient. The simulations also indicate that the location of infector relative to ventilation inlet/outlet affects Qc and Ep,c with higher Qc and lower Ep,c observed when infector is in a corner due to potential formation of a local hot spot of high infection risk when infector is near the ventilation inlet. In conclusion, based on the simulations, we propose a ventilation thermal control strategy, by increasing the ventilation temperature, to reduce the risk of airborne transmission in low-ceiling rooms. Our findings indicate that the thermal environment plays a critical role in the transmission of airborne diseases confined spaces.

preprint2023arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.