Paper detail

Numerical evaluation of relative permeability using Johnson--Koplik--Dashen model

We present a numerical study aimed at comparing two approaches to the evaluation of relative permeability curves from 3D binary images of porous media. One approach hinges on the numerical solution of Stokes equations, while the other is based on the Johnson-Koplik-Dashen (JKD) universal scaling theory of viscous frequency-dependent flow [D.~L. Johnson, J.~Koplik, and R.~Dashen, \emph{Theory of dynamic permeability and tortuosity in fluid--saturated porous media}, Journal of Fluid Mechanics \textbf{176} (1987), 379--402.] and the method of maximal inscribed spheres. JKD steady-flow simulations only require the solution of a boundary-value problem for the Laplace equation, which is computationally less intensive than the solution of Stokes equations. A series of numerical calculations performed on 3D pore-space images of natural rock demonstrate that JKD-based estimates are in good agreement with the corresponding Stokes-flow numerical simulations.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.