Paper detail

Numerical evaluation of AC losses in an HTS insert coil for high field magnet during its energization

AC losses in a high temperature superconducting (HTS) insert coil for a 25-T cryogen-free superconducting magnet are numerically calculated during its energization, assuming slab approximation. The HTS insert coil consists of 68 single pancakes wound with coated conductors and generating a central magnetic field of 11.5 T, in addition to a contribution of 14.0 T from a set of low temperature superconducting (LTS) outsert coils. Both the HTS and LTS coils are cooled using cryocoolers, and energized simultaneously up to 25.5 T with a constant ramp rate for 60 min. The influences of the magnitudes and orientations of the locally applied magnetic fields, magnetic interactions between turns, and the transport currents flowing in the windings are taken into account in the AC loss calculations. The locally applied fields are separated into axial and radial components, and the individual contributions of these field components to the AC losses are summed simply to obtain the total losses. The contribution of the axial field component to the total AC loss is large at the early stages of the energization, whereas the total losses monotonically increase with time after the contribution of the radial field component becomes sufficiently large.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.