Paper detail

Numerical estimation of entropy loss on dimerization: improved prediction of the quaternary structure of the GCN4 leucine zipper

A lattice based model of a protein is used to study the dimerization equilibrium of the GCN4 leucine zipper. Replica exchange Monte Carlo is used to determine the free energy of both the monomeric and dimeric forms as a function of temperature. The method of coincidences is then introduced to explicitly calculate the entropy loss associated with dimerization, and from it the free energy difference between monomer and dimer, as well as the corresponding equilibrium reaction constant. We find that the entropy loss of dimerization is a strong function of energy (or temperature), and that it is much larger than previously estimated, especially for high energy states. The results confirm that it is possible to study the dimerization equilibrium of GCN4 at physiological concentrations within the reduced representation of the protein employed.

preprint2002arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.