Paper detail

Numerical equilibria with pressure anisotropy and incompressible plasma rotation parallel to the magnetic field

It is believed that plasma rotation can affect the transitions to the advanced confinement regimes in tokamaks. In addition, in order to achieve fusion temperatures modern tokamaks rely on auxiliary heating methods. These methods generate pressure anisotropy in the plasma. For incompressible rotation with pressure anisotropy the equilibrium is governed by a Generalized Grad-Shafranov (GGS) equation and a decoupled Bernoulli-type equation for the effective pressure, $\bar{p}=(p_\parallel+p_\perp)/2$, where $p_\parallel$ ($p_\perp$) is the pressure tensor element parallel (perpendicular) to the magnetic field. In the case of plasma rotation parallel to the magnetic field the GGS equation can be transformed to one equation identical in form with the GS equation. In this study by making use of the aforementioned property of the GGS equation for parallel plasma rotation we have constructed ITER-like numerical equilibria by extending HELENA, an equilibrium fixed-boundary solver and examined the impact of rotation and anisotropy on certain equilibrium quantities. The main conclusions are that the addition of pressure anisotropy to rotation allows the profile shaping of the equilibrium quantities in much more extent thus favouring the confinement and allows extension of the parametric space of the Mach number corresponding to higher values. Furthermore, the impact of pressure anisotropy in the equilibrium quantities is stronger than that of the rotation, for most of the quantities examined. For the pressure components the impact of the pressure anisotropy is the same regardless of whether the power is deposited parallel or perpendicular to the magnetic surfaces, thus implying that there is no preferable heating direction, while for the current density, the heating parallel to the magnetic surfaces seems to be beneficial for the current-gradient driven instabilities.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.