Paper detail

Numerical Approaches to High Energy Electroweak Baryon Number Violation Above and Below the Sphaleron Barrier

We review some promising numerical techniques for calculating high energy baryon number violating cross sections in the standard model. As these lectures are designed to be self- contained, we present in some detail the formalism of Rubakov, Son, and Tinyakov, which provides a means of bounding the two-particle cross sections in a semi-classical manner. The saddle-point solutions required by this method must be found computationally and are of two basic types, corresponding to tunneling events between adjacent topological sectors on the one hand, and classically allowed evolution over the sphaleron barrier on the other. In both cases one looks for topology changing solutions of small incident particle number. In the classically allowed regime we have developed a Monte Carlo technique that systematically lowers the particle number while still ensuring that a change in topology takes place. We also make progress towards a numerical method amenable for the more computationally challenging problem of finding the complexified tunneling solutions, and we present some of our numerical findings, both above and below the sphaleron barrier.

preprint1997arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.