Paper detail

Numerical and modeling error assessment of large-eddy simulation using direct-numerical-simulation-aided large-eddy simulation

We study the numerical errors of large-eddy simulation (LES) in isotropic and wall-bounded turbulence. A direct-numerical-simulation (DNS)-aided LES formulation, where the subgrid-scale (SGS) term of the LES is computed by using filtered DNS data is introduced. We first verify that this formulation has zero error in the absence of commutation error between the filter and the differentiation operator of the numerical algorithm. This method allows the evaluation of the time evolution of numerical errors for various numerical schemes at grid resolutions relevant to LES. The analysis shows that the numerical errors are of the same order of magnitude as the modeling errors and often cancel each other. This supports the idea that supervised machine learning algorithms trained on filtered DNS data might not be suitable for robust SGS model development, as this approach disregards the existence of numerical errors in the system that accumulates over time. The assessment of errors in turbulent channel flow also identifies that numerical errors close to the wall dominate, which has implications for the development of wall models.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.