Paper detail

Number and Luminosity Evolution of Interacting Galaxies as a Natural explanation for the Galaxy Counts

A newly developed isochrone synthesis algorithm for the photometric evolution of galaxies is described. Two initial mass functions, IMFs, in particular, the recent IMF determined by Kroupa, Tout, and Gilmore, three photometric transformations, and a 1-Gyr-burst star formation rate, SFR, are used to compute the $B-V$ and $V-K$ color index evolution. Non-negligible differences are observed among model results. In the framework of the galaxy count model by Colín, Schramm, and Peimbert a simple merging scenario is considered to account for the excess of galaxies observed in the blue band counts. The excess is explained by the number and luminosity evolution of a group of galaxies called interacting, I. It is assumed that the number of I galaxies increases as $(1+z)^η$ due to mergers. Moreover, it is proposed that their characteristic luminosity increases as $(1+z)^3$ due to starbursts driven by galaxy-galaxy collision and decreases as $(1+z)^{-η}$ due to the change in the size of the galaxies. Not much number evolution is needed to account for the excess; for example, a model with $η= 4.0$ predicts that about 17 \% of the galaxies at $z = 0.4$ are interacting. Number evolution models with a rather high value of $η$ fit better the data; in particular, the model with $η= 4.0$ predicts that about 13 \% of the galaxies have $z > 0.7$ in the $21.0 < m_{b_J} < 22.5$ interval, this contrasts with the upper bound of 5 \% obtained with the sample of 78 galaxies by Colless et al. The excess of high redshift galaxies can not be simply explained by changing reasonably the parameters of the luminosity function of I galaxies. This result could indicate that mergers are not the whole story. Our best-fit model produces the following values for the

preprint1995arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.