Paper detail

Nucleosynthesis Contribution of Neutrino-dominated Accretion Flows to the Chemical Evolution of Active Galactic Nuclei

Recent observations of quasars show high line-flux ratios in their broad emission lines and the ratios appear to be independent of redshift up to $z \gtrsim 6$, which indicate that the broad-line regions of these early quasars are surprisingly metal-rich. Here, we revisit the chemical evolution of high-redshift quasars by adding a new ingredient, i.e., the neutrino-dominated accretion flows (NDAFs) with outflows, on top of the conventional core-collapse supernovae (CCSNe). In the presence of the chemical contribution from NDAFs with outflows, the total metal mass (i.e., the summation of the conventional CCSN and NDAFs with outflows) per CCSN depends weakly upon the mass of the progenitor star if the mass is in the range of $\sim 25-55~M_{\odot}$. We model the chemical evolution by adopting a improved open-box model with three typical initial mass functions (IMFs). We find that, with the additional chemical contribution from NDAFs with outflows, the quasar metallicity can be enriched more rapidly in the very early Universe ($z \sim 10$) and reaches higher saturation than the no-NDAF case at $z \sim 8$, after which they evolve slowly with redshift. The quasar metallicity can reach $\sim 20~Z_{\odot}$ ($Z_\odot$ denotes the metallicity of the Sun; and $\sim 20\%$ of which is produced by NDAF outflows) at $z \sim 8$ for the ``top-heavy'' IMF model in \citet{Toyouchi2022}, which readily explains the quasar observations on the super-solar metal abundance and redshift-independent evolution.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.