Paper detail

Nuclear quadrupole interactions of 111In/Cd solute atoms in a series of rare-earth palladium alloys

Nuclear quadrupole interactions were measured at 111In/Cd probe atoms in rare-earth palladium phases RPd3 having the L12 structure using the technique of perturbed angular correlation of gamma rays (PAC). Measurements were made for pairs of samples having compositions of the Pd-poorer and Pd-rich boundaries of the RPd3 phase fields, typically 75 and 78 at.% Pd. Two signals were detected in most phases, corresponding to probe atoms on cubic R- and non-cubic Pd-sublattices. Site preferences of parent In-probe atoms were characterized by site-fractions of probes on the R- and Pd-sublattices. For all Pd-rich samples, probes exclusively occupied the R-sublattice, consistent with a heuristic rule that solute atoms tend to occupy the sublattice of an element in which there is a deficiency. For Pd-poorer alloys with R= Tb, Er, Yb, Lu, Y and Sc, probes exclusively occupied the Pd-sublattice. For Pd-poorer alloys with R= Ce, Pr, Nd, Sm and Eu, probes occupied both sublattices, with site fractions varying as a function of temperature. In contrast, probes only occupied the R-sublattice in Pd-poorer LaPd3. Jump frequencies on the Pd-sublattice of daughter Cd-probes were determined from nuclear relaxation caused by fluctuating electric field gradients. Activation enthalpies for diffusional jumps were determined from temperature dependences and found to increase linearly as the lattice parameter decreases along the series Pr, Nd, Eu and Sm. Jump frequencies are believed to have been even higher in CePd3 than in PrPd3, but were too low to be detectable in Tb, Er, Yb, Lu, Y and Sc palladides. A correlation between site preferences and jump frequencies is noted and discussed. This paper provides a complete account of measurements of jump frequencies of Cd-probe atoms and comparisons with similar measurements made on other series of L12 phases.

preprint2012arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.