Paper detail

Nuclear obscuration structure in Mrk 417 based on NuSTAR and Swift/BAT data

We present the results of X-ray spectral analysis of the Seyfert type 2 galaxy Mrk 417 observed by the NuSTAR (3-60 keV) and the Swift/BAT (14-150) observatories. The NuSTAR data shows a good fit with a baseline model which composed of an absorbed cutoff power-law component and reflected emission from the cold neutral medium. We found that the spectrum is steep $Γ= 1.63_{-0.11}^{+0.10}$ and obscured by hydrogen column density of $N_{H} = 3.22_{-0.39}^{+0.41} \cdot 10^{23} cm^{-2}$, narrow $FeK_α$ emission line has an equivalent width of $EW = 115_{-1}^{+2}$ eV that suggests this feature is originated in a moderate density of obscurer. In combining NuSTAR data with Swift/BAT spectrum we also applied a more physically motivated approach using complex physical models MYTorus and BNTorus. For the first case the photon index of $Γ_{MYTorus} = 1.68_{-0.09}^{+0.09}$ and the line-of-sight column density of the absorber $N_{H,l.o.s} = 3.36_{-0.07}^{+0.04} \cdot 10^{23} cm^{-2}$. Applying BNTorus model shows the photon index $Γ_{BNTorus} = 1.75_{-0.09}^{+0.09}$ and absorption $N_{H,l.o.s} = 3.72_{-0.39}^{+0.49} \cdot 10^{23} cm^{-2}$. Based on the results we get an estimation of gas-dust torus covering factor $f_{c} = 0.29-0.34$ and an intrinsic X-ray luminosity in 2-10 keV of $\approx 3.16\cdot 10^{43}$ erg/s. Further analysis of Mid-Infrared (MIR) observational data, indicates that the covering factor maybe even smaller $f_{c} \approx 0.12$. Our results allow us to suggest that obscuring material of Mrk 417 has preferably a ring-like geometry.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.