Paper detail

NRSSPrioritize: Associating Protein Complex and Disease Similarity Information to Prioritize Disease Candidate Genes

The identification of disease-associated genes has recently gathered much attention for uncovering disease complex mechanisms that could lead to new insights into the treatment of diseases. For exploring disease-susceptible genes, not only experimental approaches such as genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have been used, but also computational methods. Since experimental approaches are both time-consuming and expensive, numerous studies have utilized computational techniques to explore disease genes. These methods use various biological data sources and known disease genes to prioritize disease candidate genes. In this paper, we propose a gene prioritization method (NRSSPrioritize), which benefits from both local and global measures of a protein-protein interaction (PPI) network and also from disease similarity knowledge to suggest candidate genes for colorectal cancer (CRC) susceptibility. Network Propagation, Random Walk with Restart, and Shortest Paths are three network analysis tools that are applied to a PPI network for the purpose of scoring candidate genes. Also, by looking through diseases with similar symptoms to CRC and obtaining their causing genes, candidate genes are scored in a different way. Finally, to integrate these four different scoring schemes, Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) and Analytic Network Process (ANP) methods are applied to obtain appropriate weights for the above four quantified measures and the weighted summation of these measures are used to calculate the final score of each candidate gene. NRSSPrioritize was validated by cross-validation analysis and its results were compared with other prioritization tools, which gave the best performance when using our proposed method.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.