Paper detail

NQC2: A Non-Intrusive QEMU Code Coverage Plugin

Code coverage analysis has become a standard approach in software development, facilitating the assessment of test suite effectiveness, the identification of under-tested code segments, and the discovery of performance bottlenecks. When code coverage of software for embedded systems needs to be measured, conventional approaches quickly meet their limits. A commonly used approach involves instrumenting the source files with added code that collects and dumps coverage information during runtime. This inserted code usually relies on the existence of an operating and a file system to dump the collected data. These features are not available for bare-metal programs that are executed on embedded systems. To overcome this issue, we present NQC2, a plugin for QEMU.NQC2 extracts coverage information from QEMU during runtime and stores them into a file on the host machine. This approach is even compatible with modified QEMU versions and does not require target-software instrumentation. NQC2 outperforms a comparable approach from Xilinx by up to 8.5 x.

preprint2026arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.