Paper detail

Nowhere-zero flows on signed regular graphs

We study the flow spectrum ${\cal S}(G)$ and the integer flow spectrum $\overline{\cal S}(G)$ of signed $(2t+1)$-regular graphs. We show that if $r \in {\cal S}(G)$, then $r = 2+\frac{1}{t}$ or $r \geq 2 + \frac{2}{2t-1}$. Furthermore, $2 + \frac{1}{t} \in {\cal S}(G)$ if and only if $G$ has a $t$-factor. If $G$ has a 1-factor, then $3 \in \overline{\cal S}(G)$, and for every $t \geq 2$, there is a signed $(2t+1)$-regular graph $(H,σ)$ with $ 3 \in \overline{\cal S}(H)$ and $H$ does not have a 1-factor. If $G$ $(\not = K_2^3)$ is a cubic graph which has a 1-factor, then $\{3,4\} \subseteq {\cal S}(G) \cap \overline{\cal S}(G)$. Furthermore, the following four statements are equivalent: (1) $G$ has a 1-factor. (2) $3 \in {\cal S}(G)$. (3) $3 \in \overline{\cal S}(G)$. (4) $4 \in \overline{\cal S}(G)$. There are cubic graphs whose integer flow spectrum does not contain 5 or 6, and we construct an infinite family of bridgeless cubic graphs with integer flow spectrum $\{3,4,6\}$. We show that there are signed graphs where the difference between the integer flow number and the flow number is greater than or equal to 1, disproving a conjecture of Raspaud and Zhu. The paper concludes with a proof of Bouchet's 6-flow conjecture for Kotzig-graphs.

preprint2015arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.