Paper detail

Novel evaluation method for non-Fourier effects in heat pulse experiments

The heat pulse (flash) experiment is a well-known and widely accepted method to measure the thermal diffusivity of a material. In recent years, it is observed that the thermal behavior of heterogeneous materials can show deviation from the classical Fourier equation, resulting in a different thermal diffusivity and requiring further thermal parameters to identify. Such heterogeneity can be inclusions in metal foams, layered structure in composites, or even cracks and porous parts in rocks. Furthermore, the next candidate, the so-called Guyer-Krumhansl equation, is tested on these experiments with success. However, these recent evaluations required a computationally intensive fitting procedure using countless numerical solutions, even when a good initial guess for the parameters is found by hand. This paper presents a Galerkin-type discretization for the Guyer-Krumhansl equation, which helped us find a reasonably simple analytical solution for time-dependent boundary conditions. Utilizing this analytical solution, we developed a new evaluation technique to immediately estimate all the necessary thermal parameters using the measured temperature history.

preprint2021arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.