Paper detail

Novel Adaptive softening for collisionless N-body simulations: Eliminating spurious halos

We describe a NOVel form of Adaptive softening (NovA) for collisionless $N$-body simulations, implemented in the Ramses adaptive mesh refinement code. We introduce a refinement criterion that the particle distribution within each cell be sufficiently isotropic, as measured by its moment of inertia tensor. In this way, collapse is only refined if it occurs along all three axes, ensuring that the softening $ε$ is always of order twice the largest inter-particle spacing in a cell. This more conservative force softening criterion is designed to minimise spurious two-body effects, while maintaining high force resolution in collapsed regions of the flow. We test NovA using an antisymmetric perturbed plane wave collapse (`Valinia' test) before applying it to warm dark matter (WDM) simulations. For the Valinia test, we show that -- unlike the standard $N$-body method -- NovA produces no numerical fragmentation while still being able to correctly capture fine caustics and shells around the collapsing regions. For the WDM simulations, we find that NovA converges significantly more rapidly than standard $N$-body, producing little or no spurious halos on small scales. We show, however, that determining whether or not halos exist below the free streaming mass $M_{\rm fs}$ is complicated by the fact that our halo finder (AHF) likely incorrectly labels some caustics and criss-crossing filaments as halos, while one or two particularly massive filaments appear to fragment in any version of NovA where refinement is allowed. Such massive filaments may be physically unstable to collapse, as is the case for infinite, static, self-gravitating cylinders. We will use NovA in forthcoming papers to study the issue of halo formation below $M_{\rm fs}$; filament stability; and to obtain new constraints on the temperature of dark matter.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access5 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.