Paper detail

Nouvelle approche de recommandation personnalisee dans les folksonomies basee sur le profil des utilisateurs

In folksonomies, users use to share objects (movies, books, bookmarks, etc.) by annotating them with a set of tags of their own choice. With the rise of the Web 2.0 age, users become the core of the system since they are both the contributors and the creators of the information. Yet, each user has its own profile and its own ideas making thereby the strength as well as the weakness of folksonomies. Indeed, it would be helpful to take account of users' profile when suggesting a list of tags and resources or even a list of friends, in order to make a personal recommandation, instead of suggesting the more used tags and resources in the folksonomy. In this paper, we consider users' profile as a new dimension of a folksonomy classically composed of three dimensions <users, tags, ressources> and we propose an approach to group users with equivalent profiles and equivalent interests as quadratic concepts. Then, we use such structures to propose our personalized recommendation system of users, tags and resources according to each user's profile. Carried out experiments on two real-world datasets, i.e., MovieLens and BookCrossing highlight encouraging results in terms of precision as well as a good social evaluation.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.