Paper detail

Notes on the stability threshold for radially anisotropic polytrope

We discuss some contradictions found in the literature concerning the problem of stability of collisionless spherical stellar systems which are the simplest anisotropic generalization of the well-known polytrope models. Their distribution function $F(E,L)$ is a product of power-low functions of the energy $E$ and the angular momentum $L$, i.e. $F\propto L^{-s}(-E)^q$. On the one hand, calculation of the growth rates in the framework of linear stability theory and N-body simulations show that these systems become stable when the parameter $s$ characterizing the velocity anisotropy of the stellar distribution is lower than some finite threshold value, $s<s_\textrm{crit}$. On the other hand Palmer & Papaloizou (1987) showed that the instability remained up to the isotropic limit $s=0$. Using our method of determining the eigenmodes for stellar systems, we show that the growth rates in weakly radially-anisotropic systems are indeed positive, but decrease exponentially as the parameter $s$ approaches zero, i.e. $γ\propto \exp(-s_{\ast}/s)$. In fact, for the systems with finite lifetime this means stability.

preprint2011arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.