Paper detail

Notes on $(s,t)$-weak tractability: A refined classification of problems with (sub)exponential information complexity

In the last 20 years a whole hierarchy of notions of tractability was proposed and analyzed by several authors. These notions are used to classify the computational hardness of continuous numerical problems $S=(S_d)_{d\in\mathbb{N}}$ in terms of the behavior of their information complexity $n(ε,S_d)$ as a function of the accuracy $ε$ and the dimension $d$. By now a lot of effort was spend on either proving quantitative positive results (such as, e.g., the concrete dependence on $ε$ and $d$ within the well-established framework of polynomial tractability), or on qualitative negative results (which, e.g., state that a given problem suffers from the so-called curse of dimensionality). Although several weaker types of tractability were introduced recently, the theory of information-based complexity still lacks a notion which allows to quantify the exact (sub-/super-)exponential dependence of $n(ε,S_d)$ on both parameters $ε$ and $d$. In this paper we present the notion of $(s,t)$-weak tractability which attempts to fill this gap. Within this new framework the parameters $s$ and $t$ are used to quantitatively refine the huge class of polynomially intractable problems. For linear, compact operators between Hilbert spaces we provide characterizations of $(s,t)$-weak tractability w.r.t. the worst case setting in terms of singular values. In addition, our new notion is illustrated by classical examples which recently attracted some attention. In detail, we study approximation problems between periodic Sobolev spaces and integration problems for classes of smooth functions. Keywords: Information-based complexity, Multivariate numerical problems, Hilbert spaces, Tractablity, Approximation, Integration.

preprint2014arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.