Paper detail

Note on the minimal size of a graph with generalized connectivity kappa_3= 2

The concept of generalized $k$-connectivity $κ_{k}(G)$ of a graph $G$ was introduced by Chartrand et al. in recent years. In our early paper, extremal theory for this graph parameter was started. We determined the minimal number of edges of a graph of order $n$ with $κ_{3}= 2$, i.e., for a graph $G$ of order $n$ and size $e(G)$ with $κ_{3}(G)= 2$, we proved that $e(G)\geq (6/5)n$, and the lower bound is sharp by constructing a class of graphs, only for $n\equiv 0 \ (mod \ 5)$ and $n\neq 10$. In this paper, we improve the lower bound to $\lceil(6/5)n\rceil$. Moreover, we show that for all $n\geq 4$ but $n= 9, 10$, there always exists a graph of order $n$ with $κ_{3}= 2$ whose size attains the lower bound $\lceil(6/5)n\rceil$. Whereas for $n= 9, 10$ we give examples to show that $\lceil(6/5)n\rceil+1$ is the best possible lower bound. This gives a clear picture on the minimal size of a graph of order $n$ with generalized connectivity $κ_{3}= 2$.

preprint2011arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.