Paper detail

Note on a Paper by Ooguri and Vafa

In a recent paper, Ooguri and Vafa [arXiv:1610.04564] argued that a mild extension of the Weak Gravity conjecture\cite{weakgrav} led to the conclusion that the only models of quantum gravity in AdS space with "radius large compared to the string scale" were models with exact AdS-SUSY. This note clarifies certain obscure parts of their argument by reinterpreting it as a statement about brane configurations in flat space. In that context the statement is that stable non-supersymmetric configurations of branes are characterized by charges in the torsion subgroup of K-theory and their only long range fields are gravitational and scalar. The field equations do not have large radius near horizon AdS solutions. Instead the horizons are Schwarzschild black branes. This leads us to conjecture that for $d \leq 11$ the K theory charges are bounded by a small integer, and there can be no large gravitational back reaction in the near horizon limit, for stable configurations. Unbounded values of these discrete charges would violate the Covariant Entropy Bound. We discuss a counterexample to the conjecture in $AdS_3$. We find similar counterexamples in higher dimensional AdS spaces, but argue that none of them lead to SUSY violating models of quantum gravity in Minkowski space.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Authors

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.