Paper detail

Not too big, not too small: the dark halos of the dwarf spheroidals in the Milky Way

We present a new analysis of the Aquarius simulations done in combination with a semi-analytic galaxy formation model. Our goal is to establish whether the subhalos present in LCDM simulations of Milky Way-like systems could host the dwarf spheroidal (dSph) satellites of our Galaxy. Our analysis shows that, contrary to what has been assumed in most previous work, the mass profiles of subhalos are generally not well fit by NFW models but that Einasto profiles are preferred. We find that for shape parameters alpha = 0.2 - 0.5 and Vmax = 10 - 30 km/s there is very good correspondence with the observational constraints obtained for the nine brightest dSph of the Milky Way. However, to explain the internal dynamics of these systems as well as the number of objects of a given circular velocity the total mass of the Milky Way should be ~ 8x10^11 Msun, a value that is in agreement with many recent determinations, and at the low mass end of the range explored by the Aquarius simulations. Our simulations show important scatter in the number of bright satellites, even when the Aquarius Milky Way-like hosts are scaled to a common mass, and we find no evidence for a missing population of massive subhalos in the Galaxy. This conclusion is also supported when we examine the dynamics of the satellites of M31.

preprint2012arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.