Paper detail

Not that simple: the metallicity dependence of the wide binary fraction changes with separation and stellar mass

The metallicity dependence of the wide binary fraction (WBF) is critical for studying the formation of wide binaries. While controversial results have been found in recent years. Here we combine the wide binary catalog recognized from Gaia EDR3 and stellar parameters from LAMOST to investigate this topic. Taking bias of the stellar temperature at given separations into account, we find that the relationship between the WBF and metallicity depends on temperature for the thin-disk at s > 200 AU. It changes from negative to positive as the temperature increases from 4000 K to 7500 K. This temperature/mass dependence is not seen for the thick-disk. Besides, the general tendency between the WBF and metallicity varies with the separation, consistent with previous results. It shows anti-correlation at small separations, s < 200 AU for the thin-disk and s < 600 AU for the thick-disk. Then it becomes an &#34;arcuate&#34; shape at larger separations (hundreds to thousands of AU), peaking at [Fe/H] ~ 0.1 for the thin-disk and [Fe/H] ~ -0.5 for the thick disk. Finally it becomes roughly flat for the thin-disk at 1000 < s < 10000 AU. Our work provides new observational evidences for theoretical studies on binary formation and evolution.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.