Paper detail

Norms of Roots of Trinomials

The behavior of norms of roots of univariate trinomials $z^{s+t} + p z^t + q \in \mathbb{C}[z]$ for fixed support $A = \{0,t,s+t\} \subset \mathbb{N}$ with respect to the choice of coefficients $p,q \in \mathbb{C}$ is a classical late 19th and early 20th century problem. Although algebraically characterized by P.\ Bohl in 1908, the geometry and topology of the corresponding parameter space of coefficients had yet to be revealed. Assuming $s$ and $t$ to be coprime we provide such a characterization for the space of trinomials by reinterpreting the problem in terms of amoeba theory. The roots of given norm are parameterized in terms of a hypotrochoid curve along a $\mathbb{C}$-slice of the space of trinomials, with multiple roots of this norm appearing exactly on the singularities. As a main result, we show that the set of all trinomials with support $A$ and certain roots of identical norm, as well as its complement can be deformation retracted to the torus knot $K(s+t,s)$, and thus are connected but not simply connected. An exception is the case where the $t$-th smallest norm coincides with the $(t+1)$-st smallest norm. Here, the complement has a different topology since it has fundamental group $\mathbb{Z}^2$.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.