Paper detail

Normalizing Flows as a Novel PDF Turbulence Model

In this paper, we propose normalizing flows (NF) as a novel probability density function (PDF) turbulence model (NF-PDF model) for the Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) equations. We propose to use normalizing flows in two different ways: firstly, as a direct model for the Reynolds stress tensor, and secondly as a second-moment closure model, i.e. for modeling the pressure-strain and dissipation tensor in the Reynolds stress transport equation. In classical PDF closure models, a stochastic differential equation has to be modeled and solved to obtain samples of turbulent quantities. The NF-PDF closure model allows for direct sampling from the underlying probability density functions of fluctuating turbulent quantities, such that ensemble-averaged quantities can then be computed. To illustrate this approach we demonstrate an application for the canonical case of homogeneous shear turbulence. Training data are extracted from high-fidelity direct numerical simulations (DNS).

preprint2021arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.