Paper detail

Normalizing Flows and the Real-Time Sign Problem

Normalizing flows have recently been applied to the problem of accelerating Markov chains in lattice field theory. We propose a generalization of normalizing flows that allows them to applied to theories with a sign problem. These complex normalizing flows are closely related to contour deformations (i.e. the generalized Lefschetz thimble method), which been applied to sign problems in the past. We discuss the question of the existence of normalizing flows: they do not exist in the most general case, but we argue that exact normalizing flows are likely to exist for many physically interesting problems, including cases where the Lefschetz thimble decomposition has an intractable sign problem. Finally, normalizing flows can be constructed in perturbation theory. We give numerical results on their effectiveness across a range of couplings for the Schwinger-Keldysh sign problem associated to a real scalar field in $0+1$ dimensions.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.