Paper detail

Normalization of the Matter Power Spectrum via Higher-Order Angular Correlations of Luminous Red Galaxies

We present a novel technique to measure $σ_8$, by measuring the dependence of the second-order bias of a density field on $σ_8$ using two separate techniques. Each technique employs area-averaged angular correlation functions ($\barω_N$), one relying on the shape of $\barω_2$, the other relying on the amplitude of $s_3$ ($s_3 =\barω_3/\barω_2^2$). We confirm the validity of the method by testing it on a mock catalog drawn from Millennium Simulation data and finding $σ_8^{measured}- σ_8^{true} = -0.002 \pm 0.062$. We create a catalog of photometrically selected LRGs from SDSS DR5 and separate it into three distinct data sets by photometric redshift, with median redshifts of 0.47, 0.53, and 0.61. Measurements of $c_2$, and $σ_8$ are made for each data set, assuming flat geometry and WMAP3 best-fit priors on $Ω_m$, $h$, and $Γ$. We find, with increasing redshfit, $c_2 = 0.09 \pm 0.04$, $0.09 \pm 0.05$, and $0.09 \pm 0.03$ and $σ_8 = 0.78 \pm 0.08$, $0.80 \pm 0.09$, and $0.80 \pm 0.09$. We combine these three consistent $σ_8$ measurements to produce the result $σ_8 = 0.79 \pm 0.05$. Allowing the parameters $Ω_m$, $h$, and $Γ$ to vary within their WMAP3 1$σ$ error, we find that the best-fit $σ_8$ does not change by more than 8% and we are thus confident our measurement is accurate to within 10%. We anticipate that future surveys, such as Pan-STARRS, DES, and LSST, will be able to employ this method to measure $σ_8$ to great precision, and will serve as an important check, complementary, on the values determined via more established methods.

preprint2008arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.