Paper detail

Normal forms of convex lattice polytopes

We describe an algorithm for determining whether two convex polytopes P and Q, embedded in a lattice, are isomorphic with respect to a lattice automorphism. We extend this to a method for determining if P and Q are equivalent, i.e. whether there exists an affine lattice automorphism that sends P to Q. Methods for calculating the automorphism group and affine automorphism group of P are also described. An alternative strategy is to determine a normal form such that P and Q are isomorphic if and only if their normal forms are equal. This is the approach adopted by Kreuzer and Skarke in their PALP software. We describe the Kreuzer-Skarke method in detail, and give an improved algorithm when P has many symmetries. Numerous examples, plus two appendices containing detailed pseudo-code, should help with any future reimplementations of these techniques. We conclude by explaining how to define and calculate the normal form of a Laurent polynomial.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.