Paper detail

Normal approximation for the net flux through a random conductor

We consider solutions to an elliptic partial differential equation in $\mathbb{R}^d$ with a stationary, random conductivity coefficient. The boundary condition on a square domain of width $L$ is chosen so that the solution has a macroscopic unit gradient. We then consider the average flux through the domain. It is known that in the limit $L \to \infty$, this quantity converges to a deterministic constant, almost surely. Our main result is about normal approximation for this flux when $L$ is large: we give an estimate of the Kantorovich-Wasserstein distance between the law of this random variable and that of a normal random variable. This extends a previous result of the author to a much larger class of random conductivity coefficients. The analysis relies on elliptic regularity, on bounds for the Green's function, and on a normal approximation method developed by S. Chatterjee based on Stein's method.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.