Paper detail

Norm estimates of the partial derivatives for harmonic and harmonic elliptic mappings

Let $f = P[F]$ denote the Poisson integral of $F$ in the unit disk $\mathbb{D}$ with $F$ being absolutely continuous in the unit circle $\mathbb{T}$ and $\dot{F}\in L_p(0, 2π)$, where $\dot{F}(e^{it})=\frac{d}{dt} F(e^{it})$ and $p\geq 1$. Recently, the author in \cite{Zhu} proved that $(1)$ if $f$ is a harmonic mapping and $1\leq p< 2$, then $f_{z}$ and $\overline{f_{\overline{z}}}\in \mathcal{B}^{p}(\mathbb{D}),$ the classical Bergman spaces of $\mathbb{D}$ \cite[Theorem 1.2]{Zhu}; $(2)$ if $f$ is a harmonic quasiregular mapping and $1\leq p\leq \infty$, then $f_{z},$ $\overline{f_{\overline{z}}}\in \mathcal{H}^{p}(\mathbb{D}),$ the classical Hardy spaces of $\mathbb{D}$ \cite[Theorem 1.3]{Zhu}. These are the main results in \cite{Zhu}. The purpose of this paper is to generalize these two results. First, we prove that, under the same assumptions, \cite[Theorem 1.2]{Zhu} is true when $1\leq p< \infty$. Also, we show that \cite[Theorem 1.2]{Zhu} is not true when $p=\infty$. Second, we demonstrate that \cite[Theorem 1.3]{Zhu} still holds true when the assumption $f$ being a harmonic quasiregular mapping is replaced by the weaker one $f$ being a harmonic elliptic mapping.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.