Paper detail

Nordhaus-Gaddum inequalities for the number of connected induced subgraphs in graphs

Let $η(G)$ be the number of connected induced subgraphs in a graph $G$, and $\overline{G}$ the complement of $G$. We prove that $η(G)+η(\overline{G})$ is minimum, among all $n$-vertex graphs, if and only if $G$ has no induced path on four vertices. Since the $n$-vertex star $S_n$ with maximum degree $n-1$ is the unique tree of diameter $2$, $η(S_n)+η(\overline{S_n})$ is minimum among all $n$-vertex trees, while the maximum is shown to be achieved only by the tree whose degree sequence is $(\lceil n/2\rceil,\lfloor n/2\rfloor,1,\dots,1)$. Furthermore, we prove that every graph $G$ of order $n\geq 5$ and with maximum $η(G)+η(\overline{G})$ must have diameter at most $3$, no cut vertex and the property that $\overline{G}$ is also connected. In both cases of trees and graphs that have the same order, we find that if $η(G)$ is maximum then $η(G)+η(\overline{G})$ is minimum. As corollaries to our results, we characterise the unique connected graph $G$ of given order and number of vertices of degree $1$, and the unique unicyclic (connected and has only one cycle) graphs $G$ of a given order that minimises $η(G)+η(\overline{G})$.

preprint2021arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.