Paper detail

Nonthermal emission from clusters of galaxies

We show that the spectral and radial distribution of the nonthermal emission of massive, M>10^{14.5}M_sun, galaxy clusters (GCs) may be approximately described by simple analytic expressions, which depend on the GC thermal X-ray properties and on two model parameter, beta_{core} and eta_e. beta_{core} is the ratio of CR energy density (within a logarithmic CR energy interval) and the thermal energy density at the GC core, and eta_{e(p)} is the fraction of the thermal energy generated in strong collisionless shocks, which is deposited in CR electrons (protons). Using a simple analytic model for the evolution of ICM CRs, which are produced by accretion shocks (primary CRs), we find that beta_{core} ~ eta_{p}/200, nearly independent of GC mass and with a scatter Delta ln(beta_{core}) ~ 1 between GCs of given mass. We show that the HXR and gamma-ray luminosities produced by IC scattering of CMB photons by primary electrons exceed the luminosities produced by secondary particles (generated in hadronic interactions within the GC) by factors ~500(eta_e/eta_p)(T/10 keV)^{-1/2} and ~150(eta_e/eta_p)(T/10 keV)^{-1/2} respectively, where T is the GC temperature. Secondary particle emission may dominate at the radio and VHE (> 1 TeV) gamma-ray bands. Our model predicts, in contrast with some earlier work, that the HXR and gamma-ray emission from GCs are extended, since the emission is dominated at these energies by primary electrons. Our predictions are consistent with the observed nonthermal emission of the Coma cluster for eta_peta_e ~ 0.1. The implications of our predictions to future HXR observations (e.g. by NuStar, Simbol-X) and to (space/ground based) gamma-ray observations (e.g. by Fermi, HESS, MAGIC, VERITAS) are discussed. Finally, we show that our model's results agree with results of detailed numerical calculations.

preprint2010arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.