Paper detail

Nonstandard interactions and interference effect in low energy ν_{e}e-scattering process

We calculated the size and sign of interference (I) in elastic ν_{e}e-scattering process in the presence of nonstandard neutrino interactions (NSI). The size of interference predicted by standard model (SM) is -1.09, while that measured in the LSND experiment is -1.01\pm0.18. Using the current bounds on NSI from the literature,we get I= -1.02, which is compatible with experiment . The result indicates that nonstandard current interferes constructively with the charge and neutral currents (CC and NC) of the SM, while the over all -ev sign (distructive) indicates that the dominant contribution is still from the SM, yet we can not ignore the contribution of NSI, as it enhances our knowledge in terms of known physical phenomena. As an offshoot of this analysis, the best bounds on NSI coupling parameters could be chosen.

preprint2011arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.