Paper detail

Nonsmooth bifurcations in families of one-dimensional piecewise-linear quasiperiodically forced maps

We study nonsmooth bifurcations of four types of families of one-dimensional quasiperiodically forced maps of the form $F_i(x,θ) = (f_i(x,θ), θ+ω)$ for $i=1,\dots,4$, where $x$ is real, $θ\in\mathbb{T}$ is an angle, $ω$ is an irrational frequency, and $f_i(x,θ)$ is a real piecewise linear map with respect to $x$. The first two types of families $f_i$ have a symmetry with respect to $x$, and the other two could be viewed as quasiperiodically forced piecewise-linear versions of saddle-node and period-doubling bifurcations. The four types of families depend on two real parameters, $a\in\mathbb{R}$ and $b\in\mathbb{R}$. Under certain assumptions for $a$, we prove the existence of a continuous map $b^*(a)$ where for $b=b^*(a)$ there exists a nonsmooth bifurcation for these types of systems. In particular we prove that for $b=b^*(a)$ we have a strange nonchaotic attractor. It is worth to mention that the four families are piecewise-linear versions of smooth families which seem to have nonsmooth bifurcations. Moreover, as far as we know, we give the first example of a family with a nonsmooth period-doubling bifurcation.

preprint2026arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.